Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Murder trial judge urges deal for nurses

Louise Jury
Sunday 25 May 1997 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The Saudi trial of two British nurses accused of murdering an Australian colleague was dramatically halted yesterday to give lawyers more time to consult with the victim's family.

A judge trying Deborah Parry and Lucille McLauchlan asked the victim's family to consider accepting a settlement rather than request the death sentence.

Under Islamic law, which is enforced in Saudi Arabia, the victim's family has the right to demand a public beheading or accept blood money.

Frank Gilford, the brother of the murder victim, Australian Yvonne Gilford, has previously refused to waive the death penalty. Through lawyers, he insisted when the trial opened that he would not accept a monetary settlement even if the British nurses' families decided on a plea of clemency.

But judges decided to adjourn the trial for three weeks to permit further consultation with Mr Gilford, although there is still evidence to be heard.

A court official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said that if they were convicted, the only way to avoid the death sentence might be an appeal from Mr Gilford for clemency.

The Salah Hejailan law firm representing the woman said that the judge asked the victim's family "to accept as a principle that it may be possible to reach a conciliatory settlement."

Ms Parry, 41, from Alton, Hampshire, and Ms McLauchlan, 31, from Dundee, have both denied murdering 55-year-old Ms Gilford.

Her body was found on 11 December last year on the floor of her flat in the King Fahd Military medical complex in Dhahran, where all three lived and worked. Ms Gilford was reported to have been stabbed, bludgeoned and suffocated.

The latest development came on a day when the lawyers had been expected to argue that it was the brutal treatment the nurses received from Saudi police officers which led them to break down and make false confessions.The nurses had been expected to tell the court that the confessions should not be used against them because they confessed after policemen stripped them and threatened to rape them.

Both nurses retracted their confessions soon after being charged with the murder of Ms Gilford last December and repeated the retraction, through translators, at the trial's opening session last week.

The court in Al-Khobar, eastern Saudi Arabia, sat for only an hour yesterday before adjourning.

In a statement, the defence lawyers said that the women "were concerned at the three-week delay and were impatient to be allowed... to give their account to the court."

The lawyers presented 18 pages of evidence and legal documents in the women's defence to the court yesterday.

Ms Parry and Ms McLauchlan had arrived at the four-storey courthouse in separate police vans.

They were dressed in traditional black Saudi cloaks, but were not wearing the iron shackles used at last week's hearings. A number of human rights groups had objected to the shackles.

Security around the courthouse was the tightest since the start of the trial. Undercover policemen confiscated a photographer's camera and briefly detained a reporter.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in