Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Michel Roux left to stew in battle with the taxman

Saturday 22 March 1997 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Michel Roux, one of Britain's best-known restaurateurs, must wait to learn whether he has won a High Court battle with the taxman.

Mr Roux, who with his elder brother, Albert, has run some of the country's most highly regarded eateries, accused the Inland Revenue of unfairly penalising him and his wife, Robyn, when he opted for a new occupational pension scheme.

The owner of the Waterside Inn at Bray, near Maidenhead, Berkshire, which has three Michelin stars, he is facing a large tax bill as a result of the dispute.

His lawyers asked Mr Justice Tucker to rule that the Board of the Inland Revenue unlawfully withdrew approval for the Roux Waterside Inn Retirement Benefit Scheme after moves were made to transfer some pounds 900,000 of Mr Roux's money from the fund to a new scheme in July 1995.

The loss of approval led to the old scheme, which had contained some pounds 1.3m for the benefit of Mr and Mrs Roux, losing its tax-free privileges and being assessed for tax at the rate of 40 per cent.

Judgment was reserved to a later date.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in