Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

How newspaper 'truce' kept owners out of headlines

 

Ian Burrell
Tuesday 13 December 2011 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Viscount Rothermere, the proprietor of the Daily Mail, was yesterday accused of being a "hypocrite" after admitting that a deal had been struck with the publisher Richard Desmond to keep personal criticisms of the two rival media magnates out of their respective newspapers.

Lord Rothermere, chairman of Daily Mail and General Trust, confirmed that, following a public spat between the two news organisations, Murdoch MacLennan, a former senior executive at DGMT, had held a meeting of reconciliation with Mr Desmond, owner of Express Newspapers.

Appearing before the Privacy and Injunctions Joint Committee, Lord Rothermere said: "I believe that Mr MacLennan, who was managing director of Associated Newspapers, had lunch with Mr Desmond and reported back to me that Mr Desmond and himself had agreed that it was not in the interests of the respective groups to use the pages of our newspapers for mudslinging."

Lord Myners described the agreement as "an extraordinary incursion into editorial independence," later asking: "Are you not a hypocrite Viscount Rothermere?" Lord Rothermere replied that the agreement had not mattered to him and had little lasting significance. "I appeared on the front page of the Sunday Express as "Lord Porn" a few years afterwards so it wasn't like a concrete agreement," he said.

Viscount Rothermere was questioned over why the Daily Mail was top of a league table of newspapers that had hired private investigators. He said that the paper had banned the use of such inquiry agents.

But the committee heard that Associated Newspapers traced people legally through two systems in its library which complied with data protection laws.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in