Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Giggs finally loses case over affair privacy

 

Martin Hickman
Saturday 03 March 2012 01:00 GMT
Comments
Ryan Giggs was claiming damages over a story about his liaison with the reality-television star Imogen Thomas
Ryan Giggs was claiming damages over a story about his liaison with the reality-television star Imogen Thomas (Getty Images)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The footballer Ryan Giggs yesterday lost his long-running legal claim over the privacy dispute last summer that led to his being mocked on Twitter for seeking to gag the press.

Giggs was claiming damages from The Sun for distress and breach of a right to privacy over an article on 14 April 2011 about a relationship with the reality-television star Imogen Thomas, headlined: "Footie Star's Affair with Big Bro Imogen." Although the tabloid did not name the Manchester United player – because he had secured a High Court injunction – his identity leaked out. Giggs claimed The Sun was to blame for the ensuing flood of stories published about him in other newspapers and on the internet.

The High Court judge Mr Justice Tugendhat yesterday threw out the case, saying: "It cannot be said the claim for damages could give rise to any significant award, even if it could give rise to an award at all."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in