ME girl's home tuition victory
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Beth Tandy, a 15-year-old who is prevented by chronic fatigue syndrome from attending school, won a High Court victory yesterday to stop the local education authority cutting her hours of home tuition.
In a judgment which affects all local education authorities, Mr Justice Keene ruled that East Sussex Council had acted unlawfully when it cut Beth's home tuition because it needed to make savings.
Beth suffers from ME or post-viral syndrome. Her parents said the decision to cut Beth's home tuition from five to three hours a week meant she did not have a fair chance of passing the three GCSE subjects for which she was studying.
Beth stopped attending primary school full-time when she was diagnosed as an ME sufferer seven years ago. Two years later she stopped going to school at all and began to receive five hours a week home tuition.
Her illness was confirmed by Dr Alan Franklin, one of the leading authorities on ME and a statement of special educational needs said that she needed five hours teaching. When East Sussex found it had a budget shortfall last year, it decided to cut home tuition levels.
The judge ruled that the council unlawfully took into account its own need to make cash cuts when considering what constituted "a suitable education" for Beth.
The council said it was considering whether to appeal.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments