Labour faces court over election expenses
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A court case could decide the legality of indirect spending to promote election candidates, after the Crown Prosecution Service yesterday confirmed that it had passed on to police a complaint about a special edition of the Daily Mirror which was distributed free in the Littleborough and Saddleworth by-election, writes John Rentoul.
The Liberal Democrats are demanding to know whether distribution of the newspapers on polling day last July amounted to an election expense in support of Labour, which should have been declared.
Liberal Democrat Chris Davies beat off a strong surge from third place by Labour's Phil Woolas to take the seat from the Conservatives.
The Representation of the People Act bans spending to "promote the election of a particular candidate" unless it is authorised by the candidate or his or her agent.
A spokesman for the Daily Mirror said: "We don't feel it is appropriate to comment."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments