Oxford City Council refutes claims by homelessness campaign that it will 'criminalise' rough sleeping
The council said that stipulations against rough sleeping would only apply to those who had a bed in a hostel or shelter
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A petition that wants homeless people to be exempt from a new protection order that would “criminalise” rough sleeping has been signed by nearly 50,000 people.
Oxford City Council has put forward a proposal that would impose Public Spaces Protection Orders on various "anti-social activities" in the city. One of the offences mentioned is “street sleeping”.
A change.org petition started by On Your Doorstep says any ban would “only increase (already high) levels of stigma surrounding Oxford’s homeless population.”
The Independent contacted the council to clarify these proposals and, while the council confirmed that the proposals could see fines given to people for sleeping rough, they said that the only people who would be affected were those who “are already receiving support and accommodation".
A spokesman confirmed that the only people sleeping rough who could be targeted were those who had a bed available to them in a hostel or a shelter and that anyone without accommodation would not find themselves moved or fined.
Peter Sloman, Chief Executive of Oxford City Council said in a statement: “It is untrue that the proposed Order would ‘criminalise’ rough sleeping.”
The statement added: “The experience of the team [working with homeless people] is that a small number of people continue to beg and sleep on the City’s streets despite receiving support and having been allocated accommodation.
“It is the only behaviour that would be covered by the Public Spaces Protection Order.”
The petition suggests that the proposals "risk treating rough sleepers as a problem to be dealt with, as an inconvenience, as a threat, rather than as individual human beings".
On Your Doorstep is a student run Oxford based campaign which aims to raise awareness about homelessness and issues surrounding homelessness.
On Your Doorstep could not be reached for comment at the time of writing
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments