Education: Letter - Testing times
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.When I taught journalism, assignments were graded by the teacher who set them (although students always had the right to appeal to another teacher).
This method was not well regarded by the head of department (who was not a journalist). He demanded instead that we used an "objective" method, marking out of ten various criteria.
We tried this method but got some very odd results. Work that was excellent got poor marks and poor work got good marks.
Clearly, it was necessary to give different weighting to each criterion. But we had to change the weighting several times before we could get the "objective" results to coincide with our own "subjective" ones.
Once we had succeeded in doing so, we gave up the whole idea of "objective" grading and went back to our original method.
Maurice Jay,
Senior Lecturer in
Journalism (retired)
London
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments