COURTS : Legal aid accounts challenged
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.In a report to Parliament yesterday, Sir John Bourn, the Comptoller and Auditor General, said that the National Audit Office had again refused to certify the accounts for the criminal legal aid scheme because of sloppy application of regulations by magistrates' courts. Sir John explained that he was qualifying the accounts for 1995-6, as he had in each of the years since 1990-91.
For applicants claiming free legal aid, 37 per cent provided insufficient evidence of receipt of a qualifying benefit and 9 per cent provided no evidence at all, an NAO survey found last year. For applicants contributing to costs, 15 per cent were not pressed to produce evidence of earnings, proof of offsetting allowances was obtained in only 21 per cent of cases, and there were errors in 38 per cent of cases examined. Patricia Wynn Davies
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments