Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Class size not important teachers' leader claims

Judith Judd
Friday 21 July 1995 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Classes of 40 are perfectly acceptable for some children, a teachers' leader will tell his union conference next week, writes Judith Judd.

David Walker, chairman of the Professional Association of Teachers, will attack the other three classroom teacher unions who have all balloted their members this term about action over class sizes.

Mr Walker, a former head who is now a supply teacher dealing with disaffected children, will say: "Some of the people currently making the running about class size are more concerned about their own welfare than the children's."

He adds: "A group of 40 sensible, well-behaved children who know what to do and are willing to do it is quite manageable."

The association, which never strikes, is opposed to a legal limit on class size. Mr Walker says: "The truth is that the issue of class size is far more complex than is being admitted at the moment. It isn't automatically true that smaller classes mean better teaching and learning.

"Some things really do need to be taught in small classes: one example is the teaching of reading. Another is practical subjects, especially where safety is an issue.

"Other subjects, however, lend themselves quite happily to larger class sizes. Indeed pupils can benefit from the kind of group discussion only possible in a large group."

By contrast, a class of 12 could be a nightmare. Given the variables, Mr Walker believes, there should be no arbitrary limit on class size as there is in Scotland and many European countries.

Jackie Miller, the association's deputy general secretary, said the danger with a legal limit was that it might become the minimum.

A spokesman for the Association of Teachers and Lecturers, which is opposed to classes of more than 31, said: "Our members would be unanimous in saying that Mr Walker is wrong. You will never find a private school advertising the fact that it has a class of 40."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in