Walker 'wanted in-depth probe into allegations'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.ALLEGATIONS of malpractice in the Brent Walker leisure and property empire were greeted with concern, its former chairman and chief executive, George Walker, said yesterday.
He told a jury that a story in the Independent questioned the legality of including pounds 7.23m from two overseas film rights sales in record 1987 profits.
The article said the money helped to turn the group into one of Britain's largest leisure conglomerates.
Mr Walker, a former boxer, who denies masterminding a multi-million-pound fraud involving bogus profits, said he was 'most concerned' at what was being suggested and moved quickly to investigate what he regarded as untrue claims.
He told Southwark Crown Court that shortly after the allegations were published in August 1988, he suggested that a wholly independent third party carry out an in-depth probe into the claims and report on the validity of the sales.
But the board decided instead to put the matter into the hands of the company's lawyers and auditors.
They were instructed to investigate the genuineness of the contracts questioned in the Independent; whether there were any profits from the deals; and if those sums were properly included in the accounts.
Mr Walker told the court: 'As far as I was concerned, the contracts were totally right.'
His company was being accused of malpractice, he said, and it was necessary that the investigation be very thorough and those carrying it out should have access to whatever documents they required.
In the event, the investigation cleared Brent Walker of any wrongdoing and a company issued a press release to that effect.
Mr Walker said that despite the inquiry's satisfactory outcome, he and his co-defendant, Wilfred Aquilina, decided to look at the whole picture of Brent Walker's film contracts.
Mr Walker and Mr Aquilina, the group's former finance director, plead not guilty to two joint charges of false accounting, one of theft and one of conspiracy to falsify accounts.
Mr Walker is also accused of three theft charges and his former colleague of one charge of false accounting.
Mr Walker is alleged to have stolen pounds 17m from the company, which the prosecution claims was laundered through overseas institutions before being fed back into the group.
The trial was adjourned until today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments