Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

View From City Road: Holes in BSkyB's pounds 5bn dish

Tuesday 18 October 1994 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Say a thing often enough and people will come to believe it, as Rupert Murdoch, who has now added his voice to those who talk in terms of a BSkyB worth pounds 5bn, is doubtless aware.

So often has this sort of figure been applied to the soon-to-be-floated satellite channel of late that it is in danger of achieving the status of fact.

Well it is not. It is a guesstimate, and a pretty tendentious one at that.

BSkyB is clearly not a venture capital flotation like Eurotunnel, or Euro Disney, or the clutch of cable TV companies planning to come to market. It has revenues, a proven formula and a track record to sell.

Yet it will be marketed on future rather than existing performance. It will be sold on the basis of the kind of earnings it will make in four or five years' time rather than today or even tomorrow. And the myriad of assumptions and estimates on which those earnings will have to be based creates fertile ground for error.

To get a valuation of near pounds 5bn, BZW, joint broker to the float, assumes that revenues of pounds 550m and operating profits of pounds 170m will rise to pounds 1.2bn and pounds 513m respectively by mid- 1998.

Yet that involves assuming that the number of satellite dish owners subscribing to Sky will rise from 2.7 million to around 4.2 million and the number of cable subscribers from 800,000 to 3.2 million. While the number of homes taking cable will probably rise steeply in the next few years, many of those will throw away their satellite dish as they do so. Goldman Sachs, another broker to the BSkyB issue, pointed out in connection with the mooted float of TeleWest, the cable company, that 20 per cent of owner-occupied dish homes switch to cable, given the opportunity.

That figure is nearer 50 per cent if incentives are offered or 70 per cent if the property is rented. So will satellite subscriptions really continue to grow? And will advertising revenues really triple to pounds 244m, the other key assumption in the valuation?

The only truthful answer is that no one knows. Just as they don't know what programming muscle the cable companies will develop, and what sort of tougher distribution deal they might strike with BSkyB. BZW's estimate that programming costs will only double by 1998 could well be optimistic.

BZW's other assumptions also look inflated. The firm believes the shares will trade on a multiple of 15.3 times BSkyB's estimated 1998 post-tax earnings of pounds 292m - a 10 per cent premium to the sector. Apply the current sector multiple to BSkyB's current earnings and the valuation turns out to be barely pounds 2bn.

What does BSkyB amount to? It is a lease on a satellite, a warehouse on the outskirts of London, a couple of channels that nobody watches and the bought-in rights to an array of sporting events and Hollywood movies, most of which are produced by somebody else. BSKyB also owns the satellite broadcasting franchise for Britain - a form of distribution whose time, with the rise of cable, may already have largely come and gone. Not much to justify a pounds 5bn valuation.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in