Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Tenants face eviction without a hearing

Caroline Merrell
Sunday 05 December 1993 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

TENANTS should be aware of new rules that mean they can be evicted without a court hearing, writes Caroline Merrell.

Accelerated possession proceedings can only be used against assured tenants and assured shorthold tenants in certain circumstances.

A landlord cannot use them if he wishes to evict tenants because they are behind in rent, and they only apply where tenants have a written tenancy agreement.

Before implementing the new proceedings, the landlord must serve the tenant with two months' notice. The court will then issue notice of a possession order. The tenant has only 14 days to reply, giving details of circumstances. The court can then issue an eviction order.

Ruth Lawrance, a campaigner with the Camden Confederation of Private Tenants, said: 'In the past tenants had a basic right to have their case heard in open court. It will lead to rubber-stamp evictions.'

The Camden tenants group said that the two-week reply period could lead to a situation, for example, where tenants returning from holiday could find that their locks had been changed.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in