SFA faces court hearing on Singer
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE SECURITIES and Futures Authority faces a legal challenge to its exoneration of Singer & Friedlander, the merchant bank, of allegedly misleading investors, writes Jason Nisse.
Bernard Panton, former chairman of Gresham Telecomputing, has applied to the courts for a judicial review of SFA rulings on the sale of his 29.9 per cent stake in his company to Ferrari Holdings, one of Singer's clients, which has since collapsed. Mr Panton, who now lives in Australia, claims that Singer breached SFA rules in its advice to Ferrari shareholders.
Ferrari paid pounds 1.2m for Mr Panton's shares but did not declare this in a document issued a few days later to support a pounds 4.4m rights issue.
Singer says the shares were bought by one of its subsidiaries, which only later sold them to Ferrari. The rights issue was underwritten by Singer, which ended up with a 37 per cent stake in Ferrari.
The SFA twice investigated Singer's involvement in the share purchase. The original investigation, which also exonerated Singer, was reopened after complaints by Mr Panton.
The SFA ruled last December that while there had been a breach of SFA guidelines, the Stock Exchange believed there was insufficient evidence to show Ferrari put had out a false or misleading circular.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments