Outlook: JJB Sports
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.WHEN A RIGHTS issue flops, it is usually something that both company and advisers would like quietly to forget. Not in the case of JJB Sports, however. The City was positively glorying in the apparent failure of this pounds 105m cash call yesterday. The reason? The flop appears to vindicate the traditional rights method at a time when it is under investigation by the Monopolies and Mergers Commission for being anti-competitive.
American investment banks have been complaining long and hard that the British underwriting system for rights issues and flotations amounts to a cartel, from which they are often excluded. Furthermore, they claim, it means British companies pay too much for their new capital. Well here's a case, the sponsors, Warburg Dillon Read are able to say, where the company ends up on top. Thanks to the underwriting cartel, JJB Sports gets its pounds 105m at the previously agreed price, despite the fall in the shares which has occurred since.
That fall is no reflection on the quality of the company or the acquisition the new money is earmarked for - Sports Division. Rather it is simply a reflection of the setback in the market. That's precisely what sub-underwriters get paid their commission to protect against. All of which makes the adjudication faced by the MMC more complicated still. You won't find David Whelan, chairman of JJB Sports, complaining that he's been ripped off, or in this case many American investment bankers protesting about how they missed out on the sub-underwriting.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments