Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Banks may block loans to potential polluters

Peter Rodgers,Financial Editor
Monday 18 October 1993 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

BANKS warned yesterday that they may not lend to businesses whose operations are potentially hazardous to the environment.

The British Bankers' Association said the risks that banks may have to pick up the costs of cleaning up after their customers could lead to difficulty in raising finance for firms in industries such as dry cleaning, printing, petrol retailing, farming and agrochemical supplies.

Against the background of proposed new European Community legislation extending liability for environmental damage, Tim Yeo, the environment minister, told the banks last week that they could not expect protection from the Government.

He made clear the Government regarded the banks as potentially liable for pollution costs along with companies, public authorities and landowners.

The BBA, representing 330 members, said: 'Lenders should not be regarded as environmental policemen nor face unlimited liability for contamination caused by others.'

Banks should not become the 'deep pockets' behind polluters who, for one reason or another, cannot pay for clean-ups or compensation. Mike Pummell, of Barclays, chairman of the BBA's environment group, said the banks wanted their potential liability related to the amount they lent.

In the United States, banks have become targets of environmental damages suits because, after a polluting company goes bust, they may be the only organisations with the resources to pay.

In the UK, banks are also awaiting the outcome of a key case, Easter Counties Leather, which will show whether a company's own environmental liability can be made retrospective. If this happened, it would make the company's own liabilities hard to quantify and make it difficult to assess creditworthiness when granting loans, Mr Pummell said.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in