Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

British lion is replaced by a number in the age of the Euro hallmark

Rachel Sylvester
Sunday 20 September 1998 00:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

THE BRITISH lion silver hallmark, which has been used for more than 450 years, is to be abolished and replaced with the number "925" as part of a European drive to unify standards across the Continent.

Silversmiths are angry that the famous symbol of the lion passant, which has represented England in heraldry since the 12th century, is to be phased out as the statutory mark of authenticity and replaced with an "anonymous number".

The hallmark of the crown, denoting gold, which dates back to 1798, and the orb, representing platinum, are also to be replaced with figures, surrounded by an oval ring.

Antique dealers also are angry that the traditional symbols identifying the year in which an item has been made, are being dropped too.

The new rules, which follow an EU directive on the markings of precious metals and which will apply to all member states, are due to come into effect on 1 January.

Britain has won a concession which allows it to continue using the traditional hallmarks on a voluntary basis. This means that hallmarkers will still be able to stamp the lion on silver as a purely decorative symbol. However, the marking will have no legal significance and could be legally left off. Silversmiths are likely to be charged extra if they ask for the marking to be included on their items.

Brussels is also insisting that British hallmarkers may only use the lion symbol on silver from this country if they agree to put it on items from other countries as well, to establish a "level playing field" across the Continent.

Sterling silver will be legally identified by the number 925 (representing 92.5, the percentage of purity required) and 22-carat gold by the figure 916.

Martin Levene, a silversmith, said: "There's been a lion punched on to silver in an unbroken line since 1544. If you've got a piece of silver that's new or 200 years old, it's still got the same mark on it.

"That was a symbol of Britain. And they're now saying it has to change to a number with a more 'Euro-friendly' look. We are very upset."

The British Hallmarking Council, which represents hallmarkers in the four centres of London, Sheffield, Birmingham and Edinburgh, also regrets that the legal significance of the symbols is being abolished. Michael Winwood, its secretary, said: "We have had to accept the situation. We had no choice."

The Conservative trade and industry spokesman, John Redwood, condemned the "absurd" regulation. "The sterling virtues of British silver have been recognised for centuries and embodied in the hallmark," he said. "The Government must ensure that British silver can still proudly carry this badge."

Austin Mitchell, the Labour MP for Great Grimsby, is to raise the matter in Parliament through a House of Commons motion. "The lion is part of a long line which gives historical continuity to silver and must go on," he said. "It fits into the English tradition and is recognised all over the world."

Hallmarking was first instituted in around 1300 as a way of protecting precious-metal buyers. The rules were extended in 1975 to include the metal, platinum.

It is an offence for any trader to sell or describe an article as gold, silver or platinum unless it has been hallmarked.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in