Forceps may be safer than Caesareans in difficult deliveries, suggests birth study

Jeremy Laurance
Friday 12 October 2001 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The rapid rise in the popularity of Caesarean births is being challenged today by research that suggests the use of forceps may be safer in difficult deliveries.

A study of almost 400 women with obstructed labour – where the baby becomes stuck in the womb – has found that women who had Caesarean sections were twice as likely to have serious bleeding as those who had forceps used in delivery.

Babies born by Caesarean also ran double the risk of requiring treatment in an intensive care unit.

The finding, published in The Lancet, comes less than a fortnight before the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists is due to publish a major survey of the use of Caesareans in the UK. The survey is expected to show that Caesareans now account for more than one in five of all births, and that they have more than doubled since 1980.

The rise in Caesareans has prompted widespread concern that normal childbirth is in decline and the method is being chosen by obstetricians and women for convenience rather than for its medical benefits.

Allegations that celebrities, such as Victoria Beckham and Patsy Kensit, were "too posh to push" prompted the Royal College of Midwives to call at its annual conference last May for women to be helped to understand the role of pain in labour and the proper use of pain relief.

Deidre Murphy and colleagues from St Michael's Hospital, Bristol, who conducted The Lancet study, said that babies delivered by forceps were more likely to have bruising, lacerations, nerve injuries and rarely, cerebral bleeding.

Despite this they conclude that unless there is clear evidence that the baby will not fit through the cervix – because its head is too large or in the wrong position, for example – they favour forceps delivery over Caesarean. "Our findings support the use of safe vaginal instrumental delivery for the management of arrested progress," they said.

The study also found that the most experienced obstetricians had the best results. "These deliveries should be done in theatre by skilled obstetricians," the authors wrote. "Women ... were less likely to proceed to Caesarean section or to have a major haemorrhage if they were managed by a senior operator."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in