Anger at asylum-seeker health cuts
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The denial of health services to failed asylum-seekers including Aids treatment to prevent pregnant mothers passing the disease to their babies has been attacked by politicians and medical experts ahead of a review which could see further cuts to their care.
Currently asylum-seekers whose claims have been refused are only allowed free access to GPs and emergency care.
Now the authors of a joint Department of Health and Home Office review to be published in January are considering imposing further restrictions, which would mean only emergency health care is given.
Since 2004, when vital Aids-combating antiretroviral (ARV) drugs were made part of a list of secondary treatment, many lives have been put at risk.
Andrew Dismore, chair of the Joint Committee on Human Rights, said further restrictions would be "barking mad". He added that if asylum-seekers did end up getting deported then the UK was likely to end up paying for their Aids treatment in foreign aid anyway.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments