Dear Paul Condon: With the news that firearms officers in London will be able to carry their guns openly and use them more readily, the editor of Police Review has a few queries for their boss, the Metropolitan Police Commissioner
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Almost everyone apart from Liberty and the loony left has awarded you gold stars for allowing the lads and lasses in your armed response vehicles (ARVs) to carry guns in the rough vicinity of their hips. Let's face it, Paul, some crews are not as trim of tum as you would like them to be. But, despite all the folklore to the contrary, you know what people do when faced by a gift horse, so I hope you won't mind if I tap one or two of this particular nag's teeth.
Is there a force ergonomist? You'll need one to work out how a driver will cope with a belt holding a revolver, an ammunition pouch, a rapid loader, a pair of handcuffs, a side-handled baton, a pepper spray and a thing for taking stones out of horses' hooves. Presumably anyone staggering under that lot will not be bothering with the pocket books, fixed penalty tickets and accident reports issued to the old-fashioned scourges of the middle-class motorist.
And were you at all influenced in your decision by the mutterings of those ARV crews who were becoming just a little tetchy at constantly turning up to potential shoot-outs - at which they have to hang about for permission from an assistant commissioner to open the box - while their colleagues in the Royalty and Diplomatic Protection Group stalk around waving Smith & Wessons? I'm sure there is no truth in the rumour that, conscious of statistics indicating that 10 per cent of American police casualties are shot by their own side, ARV crews wanted parity of firearms just in case the RDPG ever opened up on them.
But more important than either of these considerations, will the weapons be carried loaded? Even under the strict regimen of the firearms training school, accidents have been known to happen. In the days when I was being taught to aim and fire, there was the syndrome in which a single lone shot was followed by an expletive as some eager student realised he had pulled the trigger before the instructor's command.
I saw the syndrome developed in a spectacular fashion when a detective, handing a loaded gun back to a station officer (he should have unloaded outside the station), accidentally fired it. The bullet hit the station officer over the heart, but was stopped from going any further by the old-fashioned leather pocket-book holder the victim had in his top pocket - a triumph of tradition over trajectory. Similar accidents are not unknown, I am told, at the Ring of Lego around the City of London while officers are handing over their weapons to the next constable on duty.
I'm sure everything will go smoothly and your limited escalation will boost morale and provide a deterrent. But let's hope that the first time a gun is fired, it won't be someone shooting himself in the foot.
Brian Hilliard
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments