Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Sellafield children have heightened cancer risk

Charles Arthur
Thursday 20 June 2002 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The children of men exposed to radiation at the Sellafield nuclear plant in Cumbria have twice the normal risk of blood and lymph cancers, a report says.

The children of men exposed to radiation at the Sellafield nuclear plant in Cumbria have twice the normal risk of blood and lymph cancers, a report says.

The findings come from a study supported by the nuclear industry and appear to back claims made about such a link 12 years ago. In 1990 the late Martin Gardner, an epidemiologist from the University of Southampton, produced evidence of a link between doses of radiation received by men employed at Sellafield and the incidence of leukaemia among their children. But the hypothesis has been criticised, with many experts arguing that large numbers of people moving in and out of the area in Cumbria might have spread infections that raise the risk of cancer.

Now the most comprehensive study to date into the possibility has reopened the debate. Heather Dickson and Louise Parker from the University of Newcastle compared the fates of 9,859 children fathered by men exposed to radiation at Sellafield with those of 256,851 children born to other fathers in Cumbria between 1950 and 1991.

They found that the incidence of leukaemia and Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma – which are cancerous diseases of the blood and lymphatic systems – in Cumbria was twice as high among Sellafield children.

The incidence was 15 times as great in Seascale, a small village next to the power plant, New Scientist magazine said. Crucially, the risk to children rose in line with the radiation dose received by their fathers.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in