Television: It Was 20 Years Ago Today: Monty Python's Life of Brian

Maeve Walsh
Saturday 14 August 1999 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

On 17 August 1979, Monty Python's Life of Brian was released in the US. The satirical film told the story of a man (Graham Chapman), born in the stable next door to Jesus, who lives 33 unremarkable years before being mistaken for a messiah and sentenced to "cwucifixion" by the Roman governor (Michael Palin). John Cleese played a pedantic Roman centurion and a pedantic Judean terrorist leader; director Terry Jones was Brian's screeching mother; Eric Idle leapt around saying "only joking" a lot.

In true Python style, it was ridiculous, irreverent and irresistibly quotable. For many, Brian meant blasphemy, but the American critics thought it harmless: "A sly commentary on humanity's capacity for meanness, cruelty and self-deception"(New York Post). "Bad taste of this order is rare but not yet dead" (New York Times). One critic thought it was "a truly lousy movie ... dumb, repetitive and unfunny", but didn't think "anyone of genuine religious conviction" would be affected by it (New York).

America's Catholics, Protestants and Jews disagreed. The Catholic Conference called it "morally objectionable in toto", and gave it a "C" (condemned) certificate. The Lutheran Council called it a "disgraceful and distasteful assault on religious sensitivity". The Rabbinical Alliance claimed it was "an incitement to possible violence". When Brian reached the Bible Belt, cinema owners faced pickets and prosecution for "criminal blasphemy".

John Goldstone, the producer, says that, in the UK as in the US, the problem was due to "the ignorance of people who weren't prepared to see the film but took other people's word for it". He adds: "It's about organised religion, it's not lampooning Christ. But when we were funding the film, EMI pulled out because someone had told them it was blasphemous. That's when George Harrison came in to fund it."

The British censor took legal advice before giving the film a certificate - Gay News had just been successfully prosecuted by the Festival of Light for blasphemy - and it opened in London in November 1979. The critics loved it: "One of the most hilarious comedies for years" (News of the World). "I could find nothing deeply offensive in it" (Sunday Mirror). "It's irreverent, it's unholy, it's outrageous ... but it's dreadfully funny" (Sunday Express). "The only blasphemy it commits is against the late Cecil B DeMille," said the Spectator. The Sunday Telegraph advised that no one need "risk placing themselves in the path of possible offence".

Only the Glasgow Herald upheld the blasphemy charge and the city council banned the film before it was on general release. Other councils followed their lead; the film took pounds 20,000 a week in London, but many provincial cinemagoers were unable to see it locally.

Would Brian provoke the same response now? "The Church doesn't seem to have the same power," says Goldstone. "It's as much to do with what else is around - attitudes to sex and violence and everything else are so different. And video has enabled Life of Brian to be seen on a non- stop basis since its release - somehow that dilutes its effect."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in