Letters: Sweatshop scandals

John Bunzl
Friday 24 September 1999 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: The problem of sweatshop labour points up the fallacy of global free markets bringing benefit to poorer countries.

By their ability (or mere threat) to move production to lower cost countries, transnational corporations, including many in the fashion industry, can either force "flexible" working conditions on labour in northern countries or sweatshop conditions on those in the south.

With fund managers and corporate raiders standing by to rubbish any "under- performing" company, the pressure on corporations to seek out the lowest possible manufacturing costs is likely to make the effectiveness even of independently monitored codes of conduct patchy at best.

Instead (or additionally), governments around the world should consider abolishing corporation tax and replace it by taking an equivalent shareholding in all major corporations.

Tax revenue would thus be exchanged for dividends. Governments would be entitled to appoint special directors, empowered through an internationally agreed code of conduct to block any board decision that might contravene it. That code would define appropriate social and environmental standards worldwide.

In a competitive world where the corporation credo is "if we don't do it, our competitors will", curbing globally mobile corporations solely through regulation imposed "from the outside" is unlikely ever to suffice.

JOHN BUNZL

London SE3

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in