Letter: Zero tolerance
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Your leading article "Zero tolerance deserves a fair trial"(8 June) concludes that a "flexible" zero-tolerance approach to crime should be implemented in the UK. There is a great deal of misunderstanding about what "zero tolerance" means.
Both here and in the US innovative policing methods appear to be making progress on cutting crime and disorder. The common elements of these new approaches, whatever their name, are twofold: ensuring adequate resources are available for community policing and introducing partnerships between the police and the community.
The most famous proponent of "zero tolerance", William Bratton, former Police Commissioner of New York, summarised the problems faced before his reforms as: "Police had more and more calls and less time to investigate, less clearance and solving of crime and, perhaps most importantly, the police had less time to interact in a positive way with members of the community". His solution was to increase the number of police officers and revitalise community policing through "partnership, problem solving and prevention".
If this is what zero tolerance actually means, it can be supported. However, if it means increasingly stretched police forces implementing insensitive and potentially confrontational approaches, then I retain my reservations.
ALAN BEITH MP
(Berwick-upon-Tweed, Lib Dem)
Liberal Democrat Home Affairs Spokesman
House of Commons
London SW1
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments