Letter: Role model

S. J. Denton
Wednesday 08 September 1999 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: As a mathematician, I applaud David Blunkett's new initiative - using the example of the Bletchley Park codebreakers to motivate school pupils in their mathematical studies, by showing them how mathematical ideas can have the power to change history. I also share Mr Blunkett's evident regard for Alan Turing and his work at Bletchley.

However, I cannot help wondering whether Mr Blunkett's enthusiasms would extend as far as allowing school pupils to be taught the whole story about Turing. As a gay man, he was persecuted, criminalised and eventually driven to suicide by an ungrateful post-War establishment.

All gay pupils are in desperate need of positive role-models, to bolster self-esteem that is all-too-often under verbal - and sometimes physical - attack from their homophobic peers. Even assuming that teachers would feel able to cite Turing's achievements in support of such a positive role-model, under the constraints of Section 28, could Mr Blunkett be counted on for his support of this action? I ask this because of his failure to support, in recent parliamentary votes, the lowering of the age of consent for gay men.

Mr Blunkett may be keen to foster new Turings of the mathematical kind, but how many will he and those like him foster of the tragic, suicidal kind?

S J DENTON

London E3

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in