Letter: Exam results
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: All assessment systems make mistakes and are unfair (Letters, 22, 25 August). Different systems are unfair to different people.
The advantages of "big bang" final exams are that all students take the same papers under the same (external) conditions, cheating is difficult and what is assessed (fallibly) is what the student has become.
Continuous assessment reduces (peak) stress but can favour students who come from academic backgrounds and enjoy access to expensive aids (books, word-processors etc) throughout their course. Ceteris paribus, it advantages those who change the least.
Education and assessment are often incompatible. I prefer to be a continuous educator rather than a continuous assessor - with all of the two-way pressure that entails.
P K BURGESS
Department of Psychology
Dundee University
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments