ETCETERA / Bridge
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.CHESS PLAYERS make blunders; so do bridge players - even world champions have been known physically to take the wrong card from their hand and play it (after which there is no redress). Declarer's mistake on this deal was just as bad; at least, it could have been avoided if he had troubled to add up to 13.
Game all; dealer South
North
S. 8 6 5 2
H. Q 4 2
D. J 4
C. Q 10 9 7
South
S. A 7 4
H. A K 10 7
D. A K Q
C. A K J
West
S. K Q J 9 3
H. 8 5
D. 10 9 7
C. 8 6 4
East
S. 10
H. J 9 6 3
D. 8 6 5 3 2
C. 5 3 2
South opened Two Clubs and, over North's negative reply of Two Diamonds, rebid Two Hearts. This was a new conventional gimmick, showing either a heart suit or, if followed by Two No-trumps over partner's forced reply of Two Spades, a balanced hand with game-going values.
It all led to a reasonable enough contract of Six No-trumps by South. West led the king of spades and declarer held off, both to correct the timing for a possible squeeze and to see what happened. He won the spade continuation (on which East discarded a diamond) and played off three diamonds and four rounds of clubs (discarding a spade from hand) before turning his attention to the hearts.
Everyone followed to the ace and the queen of hearts and East to the third round. Time stood still before declarer went up with the king, winced and conceded one down.
What was the blunder? Why, West was marked with a five-card spade suit (after his partner's discard on the second round) and had already produced three cards in each of the minor suits. Unless he had started with 14 cards, he could not hold more than two hearts and the finesse of declarer's ten would have won for certain. South's instinctive play of ducking the opening lead had given him a perfect count on the East-West hands.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments