Letter:Statistics ensure good results
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: I agree with Dr Bird that statistics is the servant of science, not its ruler (Letters, 1 June). However good statistical practice provides a formalised way of ensuring that good science is done.
The purpose of randomisation blinding and use of placebos in clinical trials is to avoid the conscious and unconscious biases which can occur when patients or clinical investigators use other means of selecting treatment. In addition randomisation protects the public, in permitting the rigorous estimation of probabilities of obtaining a false positive or false negative result from a particular trial design.
With regard to Dr Bird's alternatives of comparing non-randomised trial results with historical data or "a scientific estimate of the placebo effect", if such estimates are based on data they are inherently statistical - if not based on data are they scientific?
DAVID MORGAN
Wokingham, Berkshire
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments