Sex education: Ministers need to be bolder and act on their findings
The DfE failed to concede there is a great need for sex education
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The conclusion of the education select committee could not have been starker. “Better PSHE (personal, social health and economic education) and SRE (sex and relationships education) has the potential to help efforts to address many ‘problems’ in society, including teenage pregnancy, STI rates, drug and alcohol abuse, cyberbullying and child exploitation.”
You might think, then, that the Conservative-dominated committee’s recommendation that sex education be made compulsory in primary schools would be quickly accepted by ministers.
But not so. While the Department for Education said it would study the findings carefully, it failed to concede the point that – in a modern Britain – there is a greater need for SRE to protect children from abuse, bullying and a whole range of other problems.
In essence, it is siding with what the select committee calls “a small but vocal minority of parents” who believe they, and not the state, should educate their children about sex. The department is also responding to the concerns of faith groups who might find some of the syllabus – such as tackling homophobia – hard to swallow.
There have been some inflammatory articles in some sections of the media criticising, in particular, Labour for planning to introduce sex education lessons in primary schools and it does seem to be that there is an unconscious fear of bad publicity so close to an election behind the decision to ward off calls for statutory lessons.
It would not be the first time this has happened so close to an election. One of the biggest mistakes in education of the Blair government was to jettison the recommendations of the inquiry into exam reform by former chief schools inspector Sir Mike Tomlinson. That was vetoed amid fears of headlines accusing Labour of ditching the so called “gold standard” of the examination system.
My advice now to ministers – as then – would be: be bolder.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments