Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Trump-Russia investigation: Evidence of collusion ‘in plain sight’, says senior Democrat Adam Schiff

Republicans say their investigation in Senate has unearthed little concrete proof collusion took place

Clark Mindock
New York
Monday 18 February 2019 20:50 GMT
Comments
Schiff: 'Evidence in plain sight' of Trump collusion with Russia

A prominent Democrat leading the House investigation into potential collusion between Donald Trump’s 2016 campaign and Russia, is contradicting his Senate colleagues who say they have found no evidence of conspiracy.

Representative Adam Schiff, the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, said there was “pretty compelling evidence” that there was some form of collusion during that election.

“You can see evidence in plain sight on the issue of collusion, pretty compelling evidence,” Mr Schiff said on Sunday. “Now there’s a difference between seeing evidence of collusion and being able to prove a criminal conspiracy beyond a reasonable doubt.”

The comments came after Senator Richard Burr — the chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee — said that his committee doesn’t “have anything that would suggest there was collusion by the Trump campaign and Russia”.

Mr Schiff has pointed to several moments that could present evidence that Mr Trump’s campaign colluded.

One of those was a meeting between Trump campaign officials and prominent Russians in Trump Tower.

Another incident involved former national security adviser Michael Flynn, who spoke with former Russian Ambassador the the US Sergey Kislyak during the transition period. He then mislead officials about that contact.

Yet another incident includes communications between former Trump campaign aide George Papadopoulos and Russian-linked individuals.

Support free-thinking journalism and attend Independent events

“All of this is evidence of collusion,” Mr Schiff said. “And you either have to look the other way to say it isn’t, or you have to have a different word for it, because it is a corrupt dealing with a foreign adversary during a campaign.”

The House investigation was reopened this year after Democrats took control of the chamber from Republicans. That investigation is one of several looking into Russian meddling in the 2016 election, including the Senate investigation which is run by Republicans like Mr Burr.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in