Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Benn revives Bill to replace monarch with a president

Stephen Goodwin
Saturday 12 December 1992 01:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

AN ELECTED president would replace the Queen as head of state under the Commonwealth of Britain Bill, which is to be reintroduced in the Commons on Monday by Tony Benn.

The Bill, which would also sweep away the House of Lords, lower the voting age to 16 and set up national parliaments for England, Scotland and Wales, stands no chance of becoming law but covers issues, notably the role of the monarchy, which a growing number of MPs want to discuss.

One Shadow Cabinet member said such a debate would be 'very useful'. The monarchy had been 'cocooned in mystery and false pretension' he said, although he stopped short of advocating Mr Benn's republican alternative.

But Government whips have ruled out allocating any time for a debate on the monarchy.

A leading article in Tribune, the Labour independent weekly, published yesterday, condemned the 'sycophantic expressions of concern' from all MPs, except a handful of left-wingers, after Wednesday's statement on the separation of the Prince and Princess of Wales. In an implicit rebuke to John Smith, the Labour leader, the newspaper said that however repellent they found 'the candyfloss and waste' of the House of Windsor, politicians of all parties felt they had to pander to what they perceived as widespread royalism among voters.

Mr Benn's Bill would establish a commonwealth of England, Scotland and Wales. Its parliament would comprise the Commons and a second chamber called the House of the People. Judges would have to be confirmed and magistrates elected.

British jurisdiction in Northern Ireland would end, Church and state would be separated and the Honours List would be replaced by a means of recognising service to the community.

The former Labour Cabinet minister always emphasises that he has no personal animosity to the Queen and, indeed, under his plan she could continue to live in Buckingham Palace - but with no constitutional role.

Since his Bill was presented in the last Parliament, one of its clauses requiring the Queen to pay income tax on her earnings has, in effect, been conceded. According to Mr Benn, the original Bill has been distributed worldwide and is even a set text for some college courses.

(Photograph omitted)

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in