A quarter of young girls have sex before they're 16

Jeremy Laurance
Friday 16 December 2011 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Girls are starting sex at ever younger ages – but boys, it seems, are not.

The trend, revealed in the annual Health Survey for England 2010, published yesterday, triggered claims about the "pornification" of British culture.

The survey found more than one in four women (27 per cent) aged 16 to 24 said they'd had sex before the age of 16 – the legal age for consent – compared with just over one in five men (22 per cent).

The proportion of women who say they had under-age sex has increased over the generations but the trend is "less clear" in men, the report says. One in 10 men and women aged 16 to 24 said they had had 10 or more sexual partners.

Diane Abbott, Labour's shadow Health Minister, said: "The underlying cause must be the 'pornification' of British culture and the increasing sexualisation of pre-adolescent girls.

"Too many young girls are absorbing from popular culture that they only have value as sex objects."

The authors warned that surveys of sexual behaviour are hard to interpret as responses are subject to exaggeration and concealment.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in