MPs praise 'Independent' campaign on circus animals
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Pressure is mounting on the Government to ban the use of wild animals in circuses.
Eleven MPs have signed a Commons motion praising The Independent's campaign and petition against the practice, which has attracted more than 22,000 signatures.
The MPs warn that the licensing scheme proposed by ministers will fail to protect circus animals. Instead, they urge the Government to use its powers under the Animal Welfare Act 2006 to bring in a regulation banning wild animals in circuses without delay.
The early day motion, tabled by Gavin Shuker, Labour MP for Luton South, has been signed by nine Labour colleagues and Caroline Lucas, leader of the Green Party.
It accuses ministers of using a "an Austrian court case which does not exist" to argue against a ban. The European Circus Association has threatened to challenge a ban imposed by the Austrian Government but the action has not begun. The motion also questions the use by ministers of the UK's Human Rights Act as an excuse for not outlawing the use of wild animals.
Further pressure for a rethink came from the Animal Defenders International (ADI) pressure group, which challenged a claim by ministers that a ban would require new legislation. It agreed with the MPs that the practice could be stopped quickly by using the 2006 Act.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments