Vantage Point, Nationwide

Lee Ruddin
Wednesday 26 March 2008 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Vantage Point is not a movie of words. It is no Lions for Lambs. And Dennis Quaid is certainly no Tom Cruise. Yet, much like another post-9/11 picture, Rendition, the film's major event (a terrorist bomb going off) is witnessed by different characters, each with a different, subjective point of view. All this makes for edge-of-the-seat viewing. And while by the third or fourth rewind, my fellow cinema-goers were becoming restless, I would say that Vantage Point's nonstop symmetrical elegance is to be applauded.

Peter Travis's film treads the political line carefully, in a Rendition-like fashion. Gavin Hood, the director of that film, refused to pinpoint the exact locale of his film – safely opting instead for the north African expanse – and Travis makes no reference to a specific religion, and only vaguely points to a possible mujahidin conspiracy. Even so, one scene, in which the US President is shown to be willing to court global sympathy after a tragedy, while concurrently finding himself at the mercy of his ostensibly hawkish handlers, tallies with the post-9/11 psyche perfectly.

Vantage Point fits squarely into the geopolitical-thriller niche (concluding with a high-octane, Ronin-style car chase that quickens the pulse), but its conventions are all too familiar. Sigourney Weaver is an under-used heavyweight here, whereas Forest Whitaker is an over-used lightweight. Worse still, Quaid, the main protagonist, remains utterly unentertaining throughout – and these are meant to be the good guys. Conversely, and perhaps predictably, the bad guys prove far more gripping (save for Lost's Matthew Fox, who is bland beyond belief).

To the unsuspecting eye, and upon first viewing, Vantage Point appears to be free of political motivation. But this would be a supremely naive judgement, for it certainly sets itself against the war on terror. Just consider the bad guy's chilling final words to the good guy: "You can't stop this, you'll never stop this. This war will never end!" Subtle as it is in parts, Vantage Point, like Rendition or Lions for Lambs, is an anti-war movie. It's just a matter of how you look at it.

Lee P Ruddin, Student, London

Vantage Point, (12A, Peter Travis, 89mins), Nationwide

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in