Actor Hartnett wins payout over sex claims

Cathy Gordon,Pa
Thursday 11 December 2008 12:26 GMT
Comments

Hollywood actor Josh Hartnett accepted £20,000 libel damages today over newspaper allegations that he indulged in "steamy shenanigans" with a mystery woman at a London hotel and that they were caught on CCTV.

Hartnett, 30, who is appearing in the West End in a production of Rain Man, is to donate the money to a variety of charities.

Mr Justice Eady, sitting at the High Court in London, was told that the action concerned an article published in the Daily Mirror on 1 September entitled "Josh Hartnett's saucy CCTV romp".

The star's solicitor Graham Atkins said: "The article alleged that the claimant 'took a mystery lady' to the Soho Hotel in London and that 'their steamy shenanigans were caught on CCTV'."

He added: "It further alleged that 'dumbstruck' and 'cringing hotel workers saw all of Josh's X-rated moves' which resulted in the Soho Hotel asking the claimant 'to take his personal business elsewhere in the future'."

Mr Atkins said the defendant, MGN Ltd, publisher of the Daily Mirror, accepted that the allegaations "are entirely false".

Mr Atkins said: "The incident never happened and accordingly the Soho Hotel has never asked the claimant to 'take his personal business elsewhere in the future'.

"Indeed, the claimant remains a welcome guest there."

The lawyer told the judge: "The publication of this false article has caused hurt, embarrassment and distress to the claimant.

"He is a serious young actor who conducts himself in an appropriate and professional manner at all times.

"He was therefore extremely upset that such unfounded allegations were published in a national newspaper."

Mr Atkins said the defendant had agreed to pay Mr Hartnett a "suitable" sum in damages and his legal costs and apologised sincerely to him for the injury and damage caused to his reputation by the article.

Victoria Jolliffe, appearing for MGN, said: "The defendant offers its apologies to the claimant for any distress, hurt and embarrassment caused by the article."

It hoped that the "record will have been set straight and the claimant's reputation restored".

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in